Comment by CamperBob2

Comment by CamperBob2 2 days ago

1 reply

(I know that it's generally rude to include LLM output in HN comments, but in this case I think it's essential supporting material to elevate the discussion of LLM capabilities above "yes it is", "no it isn't".)

You just have to be prepared to take a karma hit for it. The audience here does not consist largely of 'hackers', but seems to skew toward the sort of fearful, resentful reactionaries that hacker culture traditionally opposes.

I will say I wouldn't peg ChuckMcM as being one of the reactionaries, though. That would be an unpleasant surprise.

As far as the diagram goes, my guess is that sentence diagrams were underrepresented in the training corpus. Diagramming sentences was already out of fashion when I was in school in the 1980s -- in fact, I don't recall ever having done it. The model is struggling much the same way you'd expect a grade-school student (or me, I guess) to struggle upon being asked to perform the task for the first time.

Knowing when to say "I don't know how to do that" is still a foundational weakness of LLMs, but I don't expect it to remain unaddressed for long. We will see improvement in that area, sooner or later. The anklebiters will respond by moving their goalposts and hitting the downvote button as usual.

kragen 2 days ago

ASCII art Reed–Kellogg sentence diagrams are probably hard to find anywhere, and Graphviz can't really express Reed–Kellogg diagrams. But Reed and Kellogg published their somewhat ad-hoc diagram language in 01877, 78 years before what we now call "linguistics" was known in the West thanks to Chomsky's work in 01955. These are among the reasons I thought it might be a good idea to use the form of sentence diagrams used by linguists instead of the more compact Reed–Kellogg diagrams.