Comment by lenerdenator

Comment by lenerdenator 2 days ago

3 replies

> However, the magic word for both customer segments is "vMotion", i.e. live-migration of VMs across disparate storage. No OSS and/or commercial (including Hyper-V) solution is able to truly match what VMware could (and can, at the right price) do in that space...

Someone's gonna start working on that soon. Necessity is the mother of invention.

To me, this will be the UNIX wars moment for virtualization.

Originally, UNIX was something AT&T/Bell Labs mainly used for their own purposes. Then people wanted to use it for themselves. AT&T cooked up some insane price (like $20k in 1980s money) for the license for System V. That competed with the BSDs for a while. Then, some nerd in a college office in Finland contributed his kernel to the GNU project. The rest is history.

UNIX itself is somewhat of a niche today, with the vast majority of former use cases absorbed by GNU/Linux.

This feels like an effort by Broadcom to suck up all of the money in the VMWare customer base, thinking it's too much of a pain in the ass to migrate off of their wares. In some circumstances, they're not wrong, but there's going to be teams at companies talking about how to show VMWare the door permanently as a result of this.

Whether Broadcom is right that they can turn a profit on the acquisition with the remaining install base remains to be seen.

azurelake 2 days ago

You have to understand that Broadcom isn't actually Broadcom the chipmaker. It's a private equity firm that used be named Avago Technologies before it bought Broadcom. So squeezing until there's nothing left is the plan.

https://digitstodollars.com/2022/06/15/what-has-broadcom-bec...

  • lenerdenator a day ago

    > The truth is Broadcom is not a semiconductor company. Nor is it a software company. It is a private equity fund, maximizing cash flow from an endless series of acquisitions. This is disheartening to many in the semis industry and probably confusing to those in software.

    I hate when finance people talk like this.

    No, it's not confusing to people in software. We're well aware of your (finance) industry's reputation of sucking capital out of necessary, competitive companies for your own personal gain. If we thought we could get away with it, we'd do something about it.

pjmlp 2 days ago

I consider UNIX/POSIX becoming niche, including GNU/Linux, for the so called cloud native workloads.

The large majority of managed languages being used in such scenarios, compiled to native or VM based, have rich ecosystems that abstract the underlying platform.

Moreso, if going deep into serverless, chiseled containers, unikernel style, or similar technologies.

Naturally there is still plenty of room for traditional UNIX style workloads.