> If you want to protect your content, use the technical mechanisms that are available,
> You can choose to gatekeep your content, and by doing so, make it unscrapeable, and legally protected.
so... robots.txt, which the AI parasites ignore?
> Also, consider that relatively small, cheap llms are able to parse the difference between meaningful content and Markovian jabber such as this software produces.
okay, so it's not damaging, and there you've refuted your entire argument
> No, put up a loginwall or paywall, authenticate users, and go private.
We know for a fact that AI companies don't respect that, if they want data that's behind a paywall then they'll jump through hoops to take it anyway.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/10/mark-zuck...
If they don't have to abide by "norms" then we don't have to for their sake. Fuck 'em.
this is a very US-ian view of the world
my site is not in the US, I am not a US citizen. US law does not apply to me.
under UK law: robots.txt is an access control mechanism (weak or otherwise)
knowingly bypassing it is likely a criminal offence under the Computer Misuse Act
good luck suing me because you got stuck when you smashed my window and climbed through it
[flagged]