Comment by Tepix

Comment by Tepix 2 days ago

6 replies

Reaching orbit on the first try is a big deal. I think it deserves recognition and celebration.

Noone has ever managed to nail the landing of an orbital class booster on the first try.

jve 2 days ago

> Noone

Name another company that even landed orbital class booster on whatever try.

10 years ago it was an impossible feat many were laughing at.

  • cma 2 days ago

    The space shuttle achieved reusable booster landing in the 80s with parachutes and water.

    Delta clipper controlled burn relanding in the 90s but not scaled to orbital class.

    • lupusreal 2 days ago

      Nobody with any sense for how rockets work should be impressed with parachuting and refurbing SRB tubes. Landing a proper rocket stage the real way is an impressive feat of robotics and engine engineering. The shuttle SRB thing was a wasteful farce meant to pay lip service to the loftier goals set by earlier Shuttle proposals (such as real flyback boosters.)

      A far better example, although still not exactly the same sort of thing, would be landing the SSMEs with every orbiter landing. They obviously required refurbishment (as all Falcon 9 Merlin engines do too) and the propellant tanks were expended, but the engineering that went into the SSMEs is a much better example of precedent to Falcon 9 than dropping spent SRBs on parachutes.

      SLS/Artemis is actually using some of the specific SSMEs that have flown before on Shuttles. Veteran engines, but they will be discarded this time, no more refurbing. What a damn shame.

      • baq 2 days ago

        Shame for nostalgia reasons perhaps, these engines were made out of unicorn tears and the price tag reflected that. The new gen methalox engines are much saner economically.

    • inglor_cz 2 days ago

      Solid engine booster isn't in the same category of complexity as liquid engine booster, though.

      • cma 2 days ago

        Sure, just saying it wasn't an impossible feat.