simoncion 2 days ago

Why would you think it's a rebuttal?

Six months' wait to see your GP for an in-person visit is a worryingly long wait. If I heard someone say that they were required to wait that long for in-person doctor's visits, I'd wonder why they were still seeing that doctor and ask them polite questions to try to figure it out.

  • veltas 2 days ago

    That's the case where I live, there's only a few surgeries I'm allowed to register at and they all have this problem. I think there is some manipulation of statistics the surgeries do to prevent more being created, and to hide the difficulty in getting an appointment. For example rather than having 6 month waiting list, they don't make appointments more than a few weeks in advance, so you just can't get an appointment and it looks like nobody waits more than a few weeks. I think while surgeries are allowed to do this we'll never understand the real capacity.

    • simoncion 2 days ago

      When you say "surgeries", are you using what I understand to be the UK word for the US phrase "doctor's offices"?

      • veltas 2 days ago

        Yes

        • simoncion 2 days ago

          Cool. Thanks for clarifying.

          Man, it should NOT be permitted to play with the "waiting list" stats in the way you describe. I wish you had someone who gave a fuck about (and could do something about) the problem to report it to... that's just bullshit.

  • BizarreByte 2 days ago

    > Six months' wait to see your GP for an in-person visit is a worryingly long wait.

    I always find it cute to see what Americans consider a long wait for any medical service.

    For myself in Canada the very minimum time to see a GP is a month and a half and that's a best case scenario. Get a different GP? Impossible.

sien 2 days ago

No. I was curious as to why they are stuck like that and what country and system they were in.