Comment by aidenn0

Comment by aidenn0 3 days ago

3 replies

It seems to me that there is a 1:1 correlation between mass of virtual particle and field stiffness. Given that fact, why isn't it equally correct to say "The field stiffness is caused by the mass of the virtual particle" and "The virtual particle necessarily has mas because the field is stiff"

The author states that "it is short range because the particles that “mediate” the force, the W and Z bosons, have mass;" is misleading as to causality, but I missed the part where they showed how/why it was misleading.

sojuz151 3 days ago

Because in a classical theory, where there are no particles, there is still the same short range potential.

  • aidenn0 3 days ago

    This arises from a parameter in the elementary field equation. If that parameter is non-zero than it is both true that the field is stiff and it must be mediated by a particle with non-zero rest mass. This says nothing about causality.

    • scotty79 3 days ago

      Correct. The author explains how both limited range and particles ability to have energy even at rest comes from "stiffness" (which is how he decided to call this parameter you talk about, in order to convey physics to laymen).