Comment by suraci

Comment by suraci 4 days ago

> If DJI was from the EU there would not even be a discussion.

1. of course there'll be no 'national security risks' because EU is an ally, and the US is spying on it

2. even though, troubles come to US's allies sometimes, like what Alstom and ASML met

3. EU products are mostly less compatible, overall, it cannot challenge the position where the US holds in the global value chain, so pose less of threat

infecto 4 days ago

You still have not given any evidence how DJI is not a national security risk?

Reply View 9 replies

palata 4 days ago

Doesn't it work the other way round? You'd have to prove that they are a national security risk? Because it's hard to prove a negative.

Reply View | 8 replies
- infecto 4 days ago
  
  Like the way your irony works? I listed my arguments as why you can make a case that they are national security threats. You are more than welcome to call it a fake pretense but the fact remains that the majority of Chinese imports are not restricted and that includes tech/high-tech related items. If you have nothing more than America is ironic I can see where your endless questions stem from.
  
  Reply View | 7 replies
  
  glurblur 4 days ago
  
  The burden of proof lies on the accuser. If you are not able to provide a proof of national security threat from tiktok or dji, then don't treat it like it's a fact. All the "ifs" don't constitute as a proof.
  
  Reply View | 6 replies