Kon-Peki 3 days ago

> This is comically common, but because it has SpaceX in the name, it makes headlines.

I once had a flight from Puerto Rico to Chicago delayed because of a (SpaceX) launch at Cape Canaveral that happened exactly within the planned launch window. On the plus side, the flight was delayed just barely enough to be “safe” - we got to watch the second stage separation off in the distance just by looking out the window at whatever the 737 cruising altitude is.

I’d guess that space launches just aren’t numerous enough to bother modifying commercial aviation schedules, so they don’t (SpaceX or not). When it looks like a launch is actually going to happen and not get scrubbed, they clear a hole in the sky and then get on with their day.

  • bryanlarsen 3 days ago

    Space launches have a significant impact on aviation schedules at Orlando and a massive impact on cruise schedules from Canaveral. There has been significant effort towards tightening the size of the keepout windows in both space and time.

    • Kon-Peki 3 days ago

      Wow, TIL.

      I wonder if the Brightline extension will cause a decrease in cruises at Canaveral and a corresponding increase at Ft. Lauderdale/Miami.

    • panick21_ 2 days ago

      Make sense, Florida is the global launch mecca.

boringg 3 days ago

I agree - it is quite funny that it is getting attention. It's like a combination of Elon being on X and getting attention and SEO creating some infinite loop of everything revolving around him. Please stop.

More importantly can someone remind me what warning did the Chinese rockets provide or competitors? Not that that is a standard we should measure against.

  • [removed] 2 days ago
    [deleted]
perihelions 3 days ago

Well, some of their chief competitors (i.e. Ariane 5) don't even do a controlled re-entry of their upper stages, so they don't issue warnings at all. They reenter anywhere on the planet at an unannounced random time and place. In a sense SpaceX is a victim of its own success here.

Falcon 9 destroys its upper stages in a controlled manner, in a deliberately chosen re-entry zone (sparsely populated ocean). Ariane 5's cryogenic upper stage can't do this: it's a liquid-hydrogen engine without a relight ability—after it turns off once, you can't reignite it a second time (for a re-entry targeting burn).

baq 3 days ago

SpaceX is also like 99% of all launches, so…

  • throitallaway 3 days ago

    And with that the total number of rocket flights per year has ramped up due to SpaceX. Same thing applies to Starlink satellites "ruining" the night sky. It was a bit of an issue before, but now that there are thousands of satellites up there from one company, they're making headlines for similar reasons.

    • jclarkcom 3 days ago

      I saw them a couple of nights ago and was able to get them in a photo. You can see about 12 of them in a row.

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/u978rksgjrtvusfmpt36k/IMG_896...

      • HeyLaughingBoy 3 days ago

        Saw them for the first time about a week ago (rural Minnesota) as we were going out to do evening chores. Startled me for a second until I realized what I was seeing.

        • dylan604 2 days ago

          If you were in Jersey, you could call them drones and people would believe you.

    • sapphicsnail 3 days ago

      I've talked to people that live in dark areas and they've never seen anything like the Starlink satellites before. People are definitely after Elon but he really brought that on himself.

      • IncreasePosts 3 days ago

        Starlink satellites are only visible to the naked eye during specific circumstances for a brief period whole they're being boosted to their final orbit.

        I've seen it. It's kind of cool. 8 pale, silent dots in line moving across the sky for like 3 minutes.

        I'm sure they've seen airplanes flying at night with brighter lights, and louder noises than what starlink produces, so I'm not sure how this is really a problem.

      • ryan_j_naughton 3 days ago

        > they've never seen anything like the Starlink satellites before

        By that, do you mean they can't see the starlink satellites now with their eyes, despite the number of them? Or do you mean that before they didn't see anything and now it is a problem and they are seeing things with their naked eyes?

  • echoangle 3 days ago

    More like 50%. In 2024, they had 134 launches and globally, there were 259.

  • hagbard_c 3 days ago

    ...which result in far less debris making its way down to earth since they commoditised the re-use of launch hardware. Had these launches been performed by ULA or Arianespace or any of the other incumbents there'd be much more debris dropping to the seabed or - in the case of Russian and Chinese launchers - to the desert (Russia) or haphazardly strewn around populated areas (China [1]).

    [1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/26/chinese-rocket-crushes-house...

mmooss 3 days ago

It's impressive how the modern tactic is to turn everyone into a victim. Even the wealthiest person in the world, who also has power even beyond their wealth - even they use the tactic.

atonse 3 days ago

And they've made sure to add "Elon Musk's SpaceX" either for extra SEO, or who-knows-what.

  • whycome 3 days ago

    I thought you were kidding.

    > Qantas says it has been forced to delay several of its flights to South Africa at the last minute due to warnings of falling debris from Elon Musk’s SpaceX rockets re-entering Earth.

    Leading paragraph.

somethoughts 3 days ago

Amusingly I think it's great that Elon had a very public divorce with Silicon Valley. Otherwise I could easily see this having been titled "Qantas South Africa flights delayed by falling debris from Silicon Valley based SpaceX rocket" for maximum clicks.