Comment by fnimick

Comment by fnimick 3 days ago

21 replies

I mean, he's still a nutcase. He can be right about some things for the wrong reasons.

If you hit upon a scientifically accurate conclusion through an unrigorous process, basically by pure chance, this doesn't make you a good scientist.

alchemist1e9 3 days ago

Except he isn’t a nutcase. They twist his words incredibly.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/01/14/los_angel...

So many people who opposed him and then take the time to understand what is actually saying, not what they have been told he is saying, come to realize he is completely sane. Bernie Sanders is on that list fwiw.

  • dpkirchner 3 days ago

    The proof here seems to be an interview with someone (owner of the LA Times) who talked with RFK for a few hours came away believing he knows more than doctors. Is that right?

    • blindriver 3 days ago

      Yes, the owner of the LA times is an actual doctor and transplant surgeon.

      • kstrauser 3 days ago

        Ben Carson was a respected neurosurgeon before he publicly stated that, quote, "Joseph built the pyramids to store grain."

        You can be brilliant in one field and an idiot in everything else.

  • azinman2 3 days ago

    He filed to get the FDA to revoke the polio vaccine. He’s rabidly anti-vax, routinely spewing lies that have been debunked repeatedly. He is absolutely a nut case that happens to have some points of view that many could agree with.

blindriver 3 days ago

[flagged]

  • kstrauser 3 days ago

    My wife's a doctor, and had patients begging her for leftover Vioxx samples after Merck pulled it from the market, preferring to take their chances with heart issues rather than living in agonizing pain that Vioxx was especially good at treating.

    Turns out medicine's complicated, who knew?

    • blindriver 3 days ago

      Just because a drug works well doesn't mean that it's moral to release a drug that knowingly kills tens of thousands of people a year and then hide that data.

      • kstrauser 3 days ago

        I agree. In my opinion, hiding the risk was the sin, not releasing the drug. Many, many people with chronic pain conditions would gladly accept the risk.

        It's kind of the same with any treatment: chemotherapy may make you incredibly sick before it saves you. Willow tree bark may fix your headache but cause you to bleed profusely. Homeopathy may make you die of whatever you were sick with before it cures your dehydration. Everything has its tradeoffs.

        • blindriver 3 days ago

          We need to the full information in order to make our own choices. Right now pharma companies hide a lot of the information, including from clinical trials from drugs. All the data should be released and not hidden so that people can make their own choices on what medications they take and if they want to risk taking it, that's fine because they have all the information and they can make their own risk/reward judgement.

          Looks like you, me and RFK Jr. are perfectly aligned.