Comment by arkey

Comment by arkey 4 days ago

2 replies

To be clear, I am not about to justify any sort of violence anywhere. That said...

Many violent and disruptive students were just kids with special needs. And I don't mean mental conditions or anything like that.

I mean a kid that would do WAY better if he was in a trade class doing something that motivates them, rather than being frustrated and forced to endure a rubbish secondary education, several hours crammed into a small room with other people and getting nowhere.

But of course that's more difficult to implement than a generic standardising/equalising pipeline of norm-conforming average citizen production.

programjames 3 days ago

I think we should focus on students already trying to be a positive influence in the school, rather than catering to the bottom quintile. After all, that is how schools got in this situation in the first place.

  • arkey 3 days ago

    My point was not clear. What I'm saying is that often it would be better for a certain profile of people to not be forced to attend what in my country is mandatory secondary education, and that it would be better to put them to work on stuff they might enjoy.

    But of course that would mean the system needs to contemplate individuals, instead of collectives, and the system doesn't like that.