Comment by ziml77 Comment by ziml77 4 days ago 5 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News It really sounded to me like some grim project where you store your data by destroying houses!
Copy Link xp84 4 days ago Next Collapse Comment - In version two, instead of storing a 1 as a destroyed house, we’ll destroy them to varying degrees and then read that single house as multiple bits. Like TLC SSDs Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link desdenova 3 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - What if we just destroy it enough so that nobody would want to live there, but there may or may not be a homeless person living there now?Now we have quantum storage. Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link desdenova 3 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - What if we just destroy it enough so that nobody would want to live there, but there may or may not be a homeless person living there now?Now we have quantum storage. Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link ginko 4 days ago Prev Collapse Comment - Relatively quick to write but expensive to reset the blocks. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link Hackbraten 4 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - Version 2 works around that limitation using the divorce and re-marry technique. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link lazide 3 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - It requires super sensitive sensors through. The prior rev could be read from orbit. (/s) Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link Hackbraten 4 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - Version 2 works around that limitation using the divorce and re-marry technique. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link lazide 3 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - It requires super sensitive sensors through. The prior rev could be read from orbit. (/s) Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link lazide 3 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - It requires super sensitive sensors through. The prior rev could be read from orbit. (/s) Reply View | 0 replies
In version two, instead of storing a 1 as a destroyed house, we’ll destroy them to varying degrees and then read that single house as multiple bits. Like TLC SSDs