willy_k 8 days ago

Sure? Is “Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001)” that simple?

  • cyberax 8 days ago

    No, it's just a lie. For example, vaccines _prevent_ SIDS: https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety...

    But wait, there's more: https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/missed-vaccinations-did-n...

    Missing vaccines did not reduce the incidence of SIDS. This is as close to a clean experiment as possible to get.

    • [removed] 8 days ago
      [deleted]
    • willy_k 8 days ago

      That’s what the study concluded, how is it a lie? I don’t see where your first source says they prevent SIDS, it cites some studies that found no effect and one where “The authors concluded that these data support findings of past controlled studies showing that the temporal association between infant vaccination and SIDS is coincidental and not causal.”, so perhaps the reasoning about the findings in the paper I linked are off the mark, but what you linked does not show that the statistics are wrong.

      • cyberax 8 days ago

        > That’s what the study concluded, how is it a lie?

        They use statistics incorrectly. They looked at VAERS that is _literally_ meant for reports of adverse effects.

        So it's of course correlated with SIDS. The reverse analysis would have proven them wrong.