Comment by gryzzly
I didn’t say no right. I said “more”. You conveniently omit any agency of the people, who refused most agreements on civil division or dialogue.
I didn’t say no right. I said “more”. You conveniently omit any agency of the people, who refused most agreements on civil division or dialogue.
I didn't say you did, and I did include (and italicize even) the "more" part, but it was in a later edit that you may not have seen.
You conveniently omit any agency of the people, who refused most agreements on civil division or dialogue.
Aside from this being a warped narrative -- none of the interceding events, however you might prefer to spin them, have any bearing on the basic principle (and the categorical distinction between the types of claims) just outlined. Which of course applies to any continuously resident community of peoples, anywhere.