Comment by pfannkuchen

Comment by pfannkuchen 2 months ago

2 replies

Is it just the nature of singleton entities such as government agencies?

When NASA was first spun up in the late 1950s, there were no career NASA people. The people were hired from private industry. Nobody had heard of it, and it had no track record, so people probably did not join it for the prestige.

These days I feel like there is a lot of prestige associated with working for NASA. Everyday people think you are a genius for working there.

There are likely a lot of clout chasing bureaucrat types gumming up the works these days. And there is no competitor currently with the potential for a government money hose.

US government should probably have at least two competing space agencies, preferably more.

Also the field of software engineering has brain drained physical sciences and engineering for the last several decades. If you glance at salaries before choosing a major you are probably not going to do many of the disciplines related to rocketry.

kochikame 2 months ago

You’re suggesting adding competing agencies in the name of efficiency? When this has been tried it always results in duplication of efforts, territorial protection of resources, harmful politics etc.

Bad idea.

  • pfannkuchen 2 months ago

    Unsatisfying dismissal. Duplication of efforts is WAI. Other two happen in government generally.

    Can you name the examples you are thinking of where this happened to apparently an extreme degree?

    Also not all government programs are equal. Space travel has the handy property of being easy to apply simple objective metrics (“did you land on the moon, y/n?”), unlike almost every other agency (“is our children learning?”).