Comment by snvzz

Comment by snvzz 10 months ago

8 replies

>lack of REG+REG and REG+SHIFTED_REG addressing modes handicaps it significantly

Is this a guess, or statistically supported on a body of empirical evidence like the RISC-V spec is?

dmitrygr 10 months ago

Compile same code for aarch64 and riscv64. Compare.

It is well known design deficiency. Much like lack of bit field ops.

  • camel-cdr 10 months ago

    Do you have code examples for this? I'm looking for cases where RISC-V is lacking compared to arm.

  • snvzz 10 months ago

    Sounds extremely subjective.

    i.e. it does not have my favored instructions or addressing modes, so it must be worse.

    • jodrellblank 10 months ago

      You’re replying to the author of the post explaining why he would have to do more in software to emulate RISC-V than MIPS and that would be more effort and run slower, and you’re telling him “that’s extremely subjective”?

      How is that subjective?

      • Dylan16807 10 months ago

        "well known design deficiency" is the subjective part.

    • smolder 10 months ago

      Much like juggling with your feet instead of hands is subjectively worse.

      • snvzz 10 months ago

        From a hardware perspective, juggling is better without flags and without unnecessary addressing modes.

        Neither are concepts RISC-V invented, but rather, adopted. Ideas that have been plenty tested out there, and proven beneficial.

        Large body of evidence trumps intuition and guesswork. Most of this is documented in the spec itself and/or in:

        Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (John L. Hennessy, David A. Patterson)

        • smolder 10 months ago

          I just meant that it's somewhat unergonomic when dealing with the instruction set directly, FWIW. Thanks for the reference.