Comment by j_crick
Oh, we all do run on them, I think, because our experiences are moderated by chemicals in our brains anyway. Shift your hormonal balance here or there just a bit, and this or that part of your identity or behavior can get marginally out of your control.
Some people, like you, in their "default" state can control their behavior to a degree that allows them to choose the "loudness" of their reactions to external stimuli. Perhaps you can still be technically angered by something minuscule, but at least you're able to choose to not react and refocus your attention onto something else. Therefore, it might be said that you have the ability to reflect upon your feelings and behavior in perceived real time and adjust them to some degree. It's like you're an external observer to a state machine of yourself, or you're running a reflective feedback loop always on, or that you can actually give the taxi driver of your brain actual directions that they would follow. Which, I certainly agree, is quite practical and useful, liberating even.
In my earlier comment I tried to imply that for many people what you experience as normal may be borderline impossible, therefore getting angry at a phone is "normal". It is that they may be not able to target their reactions with any precision that you're used to. I think you can find evidence of that pretty much everywhere.
Damn, I feel like you explained how I experience my existence better than I could lol.
How other people experience it, I just have to do my best to imagine it.
I mean is not like I can’t get mad. It just takes way, way more I guess. Like if someone killed my pet or something I wound certainly be angry. But something like my phone UI just seems so trivial and so minuscule and unimportant in the grand scheme of life that it doesn’t seem to warrant getting angry at.
The apparent irrationality of getting angry at something so small and honestly meaningless compared to life seems to allow me to “ignore” it.