Comment by sevensor

Comment by sevensor 10 months ago

4 replies

> Then they acquire land, becoming physical “countries” with their own laws. These would exist alongside existing nation states, and eventually, replace them altogether.

Let’s assume for a moment they’re not as stupid as this makes them sound. (Because, good luck getting nation states to let go one inch of territory their people have bled over for hundreds of years.) What are they really after? More tax havens? Free trade zones? Regimes with weaker enforcement against money laundering?

Ultimately private companies can exist only because the state allows it. Just last year we all saw what happens when a private army threatens state power.

inquisitorG 10 months ago

I read this as the delusional fantasy of a wanna be little dictator:

“Obviously, democracy is great,” he said. “But the best ruler is a moral dictator. Some people call [that] the philosopher king.”

Dylan16807 10 months ago

> Because, good luck getting nation states to let go one inch of territory their people have bled over for hundreds of years.

That claim feels right to me, but it's weird when you look at how much territory the US has bought for less than a thousand dollars per square mile in today's money.

  • a_victorp 10 months ago

    The difference is that the US already had an army

    • Dylan16807 10 months ago

      But can you even imagine two countries doing a deal like that today?