Comment by serial_dev

Comment by serial_dev 10 months ago

4 replies

It’s the “chrome replacement we have been waiting for”, but (if I read this right), my data is still sent to Firebase? Also it’s a browser, not a “tinder but for cats” startup idea I’m writing for my cousin for a beer.

It’s not only not a smart engineering decision, it’s also a terrible product, reputation and marketing decision.

notoverthere 10 months ago

I'm not disagreeing about the severity of the security vulnerability that has been uncovered – to be clear, it's an absolute shocker of a bug. It's really disappointing to see.

But I still disagree that the use of Firebase, in and of itself, is a bad engineering decision. It's just a tool, and it's up to you how you use it.

Firebase gives you all features needed to secure your backend. But if you configure it incorrectly, then _that's_ where the poor engineering comes into play. It should have been tested more comprehensively.

Sure. You could build your own backend rather than using a Backend-as-a-Service platform. But for what gain? If you don't test it properly, you'll still be at risk of security holes.

shermantanktop 10 months ago

> a “tinder but for cats” startup idea

Needs a name. Meowr? Hissr?

  • duskwuff 10 months ago

    Yowlr. (Which is apparently a dubstep musician.)

    • nosioptar 10 months ago

      (Dubstep isn't music.)

      My cats would use Yowlr.