umanwizard 10 months ago

Am I too optimistic? I feel like most regular people I know wouldn’t sell this off. Most people are not antisocial criminals by nature, and also wouldn’t know how to contact a “state actor” even if they wanted to.

  • pityJuke 10 months ago

    > also wouldn’t know how to contact a “state actor” even if they wanted to.

    That's why brokerages like Zerodium exist - you can sell it to them, and they'll sell it onto state actors.

    • apitman 10 months ago

      How does this work in practice? What systems are in place to prevent someone selling an exploit and then turning around and disclosing it properly as soon as they have the money, potentially getting even more money through legal channels? Is there some sort of escrow?

      • [removed] 10 months ago
        [deleted]
  • diggan 10 months ago

    > Am I too optimistic? I feel like most regular people I know wouldn’t sell this off.

    Probably you're just used to a relatively good life, not a bad thing :)

    Image being able to sell this off for $20,000 (although I think you could ask for more, seems to be a really bad vulnerability) in a marketplace, for >90% of the world that's a pretty good amount of money that you could survive a long time on or add a lot of additional quality to your life.

  • timeon 10 months ago

    Opportunity makes a thief. Most people does not have the opportunity even if they have skill.

saagarjha 10 months ago

A malicious party who wants a vulnerability in a browser effectively nobody uses?

  • shepherdjerred 10 months ago

    Arc is used disproportionately by users who work in tech which tend to be paid quite well.

    Am I wrong in thinking that with this vuln you could drain any financial accounts that they log into Arc with? Or, if they use Arc at work, that you now have a way to exfiltrate whatever data you want?

    A browser vuln is about as bad as an OS vuln considering how much we use browsers for.