Comment by miniupuchaty

But are you saying that compared to DX or just in general?

We're talking here about potential DX replacement, not about design in general and the bulk of it is very similar for both APIs.

There are some small quirks from Vulkan being made to be easily extensible which in the end I consider worth it.

I personally like how consistent the API is in both patterns and naming. After using it for a while, it's easy to infer what function will do from the name, how it will handle memory, and what you'll need to do with that object after the fact.

I find documentation better than the DX one.

What are your biggest problems with it?