Comment by JumpCrisscross

Comment by JumpCrisscross 10 months ago

4 replies

> before anyone asks, "personalized advertisements" is not a good reason

The good reason is growth. Our AI sector is based on, in large part, the fruits of these data. Maybe it's all baloney, I don't know. But those are jobs, investment and taxes that e.g. Europe has skipped out on that America and China are capitalising on.

My point, by the way, isn't pro surveillance. I enjoy my privacy. But blanket labelling personal data as radioactive doesn't seem to have any benefit to it outside emotional comfort. Instead, we need to do a better job of specifying which data are harmful to accumulate and why. SSNs are obviously not an issue. Data that can be used to target e.g. election misinformation are.

thfuran 10 months ago

So you're saying it's all vastly valuable and that's why it is right that it is taken without consent or compensation?

  • JumpCrisscross 10 months ago

    > it's all vastly valuable and that's why it is right that it is taken without consent or compensation?

    No, I'm saying it's a common with a benefit to utilisation. A lot of discussions around data involve zealouts on both sides. (One claiming it's the god-given right to harvest everyone's personal information. The other acting like it's the crime of the century for their email address to be leaked.)

rockskon 10 months ago

See - your problem is you think you're talking to politicians, Facebook-era journalists, disinfo activists.

Most people here have thought more about the the topic of privacy in the modern era far more than what some 70 year old politician has.