Comment by Clubber

Comment by Clubber 10 months ago

10 replies

>and people are ok with that.

All the propagandists said he was a Russian asset, as if even if that were true, it somehow negated the fact that we were now living under a surveillance state.

>Snowden pointed and everyone looked at his finger.

This is a great way of putting it.

lesuorac 10 months ago

> it somehow negated the fact that we were now living under a surveillance state.

There's long been surveillance programs and also numerous laws outlining the responsibilities of telecom provides to enable wire tapping.

There's really nothing new from Snowden besides the names of a bunch of people to go kill cause they're spies.

FISA [1] isn't a private law either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_the_Unite...

Note: 2006 (Klien) predates 2013 (Snowden)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveilla...

  • roenxi 10 months ago

    There was something substantially new after Snowden though - prior to his leaks if you pointed out what the US government was likely up to people would laugh at the idea and ask for more sources. Afterwards they tended just accept it.

    There was a big cultural shift from the default assumption in polite company being "They're spying on Middle Easterners" to "they're spying on everyone, everywhere" when talking about US spying.

  • simoncion 10 months ago

    > There's long been surveillance programs and also numerous laws outlining the responsibilities of telecom provides to enable wire tapping.

    Laws which the telecoms were knowingly and willfully breaking for years.

    You do remember that Congress gave them retroactive immunity? [0][1] You do know that this was only granted because people COULD sue (and were suing) them because of the information made public by Snowden and others?

    [0] <https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/retroactive-tele...>

    [1] See Title II of the this bill <https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/6304>

  • Clubber 10 months ago

    >There's really nothing new from Snowden besides the names of a bunch of people to go kill cause they're spies.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc...

    • lesuorac 10 months ago

      You are dense. Imagine a government authorizes 10B for a bridge and then in 5 years a bridge shows up.

      Now instead, imagine in 1978 [1] a government authorizes "United States federal law that establishes procedures for the surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence on domestic soil" and in 2008 [2] amends it to not be a big deal if they're foreign or not and then 5 years later it turns out they're doing just that.

      These bills are not secret. Were not secret. Have never been secret. It's not my fault you didn't read them but it doesn't make Snowden novel.

      [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveilla...

      [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveilla...

      • Clubber 10 months ago

        >You are dense.

        Well, maybe you're one of those propagandists. If you can't attack the idea, attack the person, right?

        Hand waves, nothing new to see here, carry on.

        The bills aren't what were exposed, it was more the techniques and scope. Like PRISM and XKeyScore and circumventing laws by sharing intelligence on US citizens with allies who aren't restricted by US laws. Spying on allied governments, etc. You know, that stuff.

        You should really click on the link.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc...