Comment by vel0city

Comment by vel0city 10 hours ago

2 replies

> My main concern is power level. How much power can you emit if Joe in accounting is 8 feet away from it

That was my first takeaway from the photo from outside. The kinds of antennas they put on top of buildings routinely run many hundreds to a thousand watts or more of power directionally out into the city. That's fine when you're putting it on equipment outside the building on a controlled access roof pointing away from the occupants in the building. Everyone actually in the beam pattern is going to be far away from the active elements.

This design doesn't seem to be incredibly directional especially outwards. You're not going to be able to run much power on that antenna, and now you're going to have it on the inside of metallized glass. A lot of that energy is going to stay in the building. I wouldn't want the desk next to this if it's going to run even 100W. Just asking to get some good RF burns.

Reason077 6 hours ago

> ”A lot of that energy is going to stay in the building.”

Right. The point of these small cell sites is usually to improve coverage within the building.

Occupational RF exposure is pretty strictly regulated in most countries. I’m sure there is design/installation guidance to ensure they stay well within legal limits.

  • vel0city 5 hours ago

    > The point of these small cell sites is usually to improve coverage within the building

    That's not what the article is stating. If that was its use, there are plenty of 5G antennas that can look like any of the other warts commonly found on office ceilings like smoke detectors and other wireless ap's and what not.

    > attached to a building window inside and turn the outdoors into a service area

    These aren't specifically for indoor coverage, its specifically for outdoor coverage.