Comment by sandworm101

Comment by sandworm101 19 hours ago

3 replies

They don't, but depending on one's understanding an perspective they can be described as violating. The point is that just because something can possibly be described as a violation does not mean that there are perhaps other perspectives that may understand them without such violation.

schiffern 19 hours ago

The paper claims to generate energy "without a temperature gradient." If there's a hidden temperature gradient somewhere, then the paper is still incorrect.

Given the extremely small power levels, I expect that if it's not a hidden temperature gradient (eg between local air temperature and local radiant temperature, similar to PV) then they're actually seeing some sort of static electricity or air movement effect.

  • 11101010001100 19 hours ago

    Yes, it is probably better described as a shitty battery NOT a thermoelectric.

[removed] 19 hours ago
[deleted]