yjftsjthsd-h 21 hours ago

Through a NAT64 NAT. Which is extra work, but not that bad.

Reply View 1 reply
  • Arnt 21 hours ago

    Well, we have that. What GP refers to is a missed opportunity, so NAT64 can't be what GP has in mind.

    Reply View 0 replies
[removed] 21 hours ago
[deleted]
Reply View 0 replies
commandersaki 21 hours ago

Not really my point, was just pointing out there's scant incentive to transition from the incumbent.

Reply View 1 reply
  • Arnt a minute ago

    And to do that, you mentioned a condition that's either ① satisfied by current IPv6 or ② impossible to satisfy, and for which that's clear on even a moment's reflection. Not sure which of those two you had in mind, but in either case: Please don't do such things.

    Reply View 0 replies