Comment by alfiedotwtf

Comment by alfiedotwtf a day ago

8 replies

If it’s that expensive to run Tor nodes, who is actually paying for them? I’ve heard individuals getting doors kicked in for participating in the network, so it’s not individuals. Corporates too wouldn’t want this type of burden… so is it really just spy-vs-spy

p4bl0 a day ago

Many individuals contribute to running relays. And there are non-profit organizations collecting donations to operates Tor exit nodes:

- https://www.torservers.net/

- https://nos-oignons.net/

  • idiotsecant 10 hours ago

    This is probably strictly true but it smacks to me of 'many people say'. I wonder what % of TOR nodes are run by people with an ideological allegiance for the network vs how many are run by nation-state actors.

akimbostrawman a day ago

only exit nodes get there door kicked in and they are the minority and not needed for the tor network to function

  • zerd 11 hours ago

    They are pretty essential, without them you can only access onion services.

0points a day ago

> I’ve heard individuals getting doors kicked in for participating in the network, so it’s not individuals.

It's individuals

  • autoexec 12 hours ago

    Unless something has changed, one of the issues with Tor is that it tries to send traffic through servers that have the most bandwidth which are pretty much certain to be servers owned by the state a lot of the time because a random person's residential cable modem is going to be a lot less capable.

    • input_sh 12 hours ago

      Run by individuals doesn't necessarily mean run on potato hardware. I ran a highly reputable (non-exit) node on a beefy but underutilised dedicated server for at least half a decade.

immibis 21 hours ago

I run a non-exit node any time I have the spare resources. I2P too. This means they're on the same popular providers that have too many other nodes, though.

Sometimes I set it up as a bridge (hidden entry node) instead.