Comment by tsimionescu

Comment by tsimionescu 10 months ago

6 replies

Attacking millitatns while they are in the middle of civilians, especially when they are not doing that as part of some hostage/human shield operation, is not OK.

PeterisP 10 months ago

The existing conventions do not prohibit attacking militants while they are in the middle of civilians, even if they are not doing that as part of some hostage/human shield operation. It may be considered morally not ok, but doing so does not violate any obligation.

  • tptacek 10 months ago

    That's not exactly true; it would depend on how you attacked the combatants, and how much collateral damage you caused. Civilian casualties must be proportionate to the military value of the target.

    Reporting is still coming in on these attacks so virtually every comment on these huge long threads could end up falsified one way or the other, but from what I can tell, it looks like these attacks will not only clear that bar, but that they'll do so in a way unprecedented in the history of modern warfare. But we'll see!

dralley 10 months ago

[flagged]

  • anthk 10 months ago

    Tell that to the seriously injured practicioners, children and civilians.

    • dralley 10 months ago

      What military action do you propose that has zero chance of collateral damage whatsoever?

      This is vastly better than the alternative of dropping even relatively small (250lb) bombs. This is vastly better than pretty much every alternative.

      • anthk 10 months ago

        A kick in the balls isn't per se good compared to a full beat up.

        >what military op

        Try to cut funds to madrassas bound to terror and indoctrination.