Comment by kvgr
Comment by kvgr 10 months ago
[flagged]
Comment by kvgr 10 months ago
[flagged]
>It's terrorism if non-combatants are the target
This is actually insufficient, unless you think the bombing of Berlin was terrorism. If your attack is about primarily about reducing military capability then it isn't terrorism.
Bombing a tank factory staffed entirely by civilians is not terrorism. Launching an expensive cruise missile against a single apartment block is probably terrorism, but if that apartment block houses all the scientists of the Manhattan project, maybe it's not. Bombing a military base isn't terrorism even if you end up killing all the families of the soldiers stationed there.
When planning such operation you cannot be certain that:
1. all the devices will land in hands of legitimate targets
2. all those devices will be actually used by targets at the moment of explosion
3. there will be no civilians in the range of explosion
Because of that civilian casualties should be anticipated at unknown scale. Since Israel pulled the trigger knowing that, it means they deliberately targeted civilians along with legitimate targets.
How can we qualify atomic bombing of Japan during WW2 under this definition?
Inflicting casualties on innocent people to instill terror in the population has literally been Israel's military policy for at least half a century.
It is terrorism if the attack is planned in such a way, where innocent people will suffer with very high probability and nothing is done to prevent that.