Comment by abalone

Comment by abalone a year ago

4 replies

They detonated the bombs in supermarkets and homes. It is 100% an accurate description of what happened.

If an enemy targeted members of American political parties that have sponsored terrorism and brutal dictatorships, detonating thousands of bombs in supermarkets and homes maiming nearby civilians and killing children, would you also call this “objectively a good thing?”

dijit a year ago

The bombs didn't even have enough force to kill 99.6% of people who had them attached physically to their waists. Semantically, that's a pretty big difference.

  • imtringued a year ago

    I don't know what to tell you, but "warning" people like this is generally how terrorists do it.

    • dijit a year ago

      clearly this was an attack of military targets. not a warning.

  • [removed] a year ago
    [deleted]