lm28469 2 days ago

It's ok their profit margin will go from 50% to 47%, they already have so much money that they don't even know what to do with it anymore

  • maxglute 2 days ago

    I'm mainly curious if TSMC estimates that US fabs would cost 50% more is confirmed or not.

    • mrguyorama 2 days ago

      It's hard to not cost more than employees who think it's literally a patriotic duty to sacrifice yourself for a profitable company. American execs Dream of this kind of non-monetary influence on the work force

anentropic 2 days ago

Presumably competitive otherwise Apple wouldn't be buying them?

  • maxglute 2 days ago

    IIRC morris chang indicated US operated fabs would cost ~50% higher, which is not cost competitive, well not something buyers would sign for without something happening behind the scenes (i.e. US gov pushes Nvidia and Apple to use Intel foundries). If A16 is $100 from TSMC TW, it's $150 from TMSC US, presumably $50 to BOM is something Apple can afford, but most others might not. List of companies who are willing to source at 50% limited (unless incentives).

    • dubcanada 2 days ago

      Some of that has to be offset by shipping, importing fees, etc. But I do think the end goal is to get Apple/Nvidia/etc back on US soil manufacturing wise.

      • fngjdflmdflg 2 days ago

        >shipping, importing fees

        Don't these chips still need to be sent to China for assembly by Foxconn? If anything this will increase costs even more and seems like import fees could potentially be even higher due to the current US-China trade war. Unless there is a plan to assemble everything in the US/Mexico as well. But then the costs would be way higher to assemble outside of China: certainly in US but probably also in Mexico, and I don't think they have any factories there.

    • raverbashing 2 days ago

      Nah

      $100/$150 would be the "shelf price" of the Apple chips if they were in a box for sale like an Intel/AMD one

      I believe you that the cost of the delivered (roll of) plastic chips is 50% bigger in the US. Probably less but it might be (also need to include the logistic cost to send it back to assembly on iPhone, etc)

      Apple (pre-)pays for stuff and probably doesn't have any orders where Qty is under 7 digits with these big vendors.

    • nova22033 2 days ago

      well not something buyers would sign for

      I bet a lot of people thought the same thing about a phone costing more than $1000 but here we are..

    • gtirloni 2 days ago

      This should not be a problem as 100% of Trump supporters will gladly pay the price to further their fight against China. /s

      • ta988 2 days ago

        They found a new enemy it seems with their cats and dogs stories.