Comment by esjeon

Comment by esjeon 3 days ago

2 replies

I hope people discuss using more precise terms. UN Security Council Resolution 1566 outlines what is generally considered as terrorism:

"criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror in the general public or in a group of persons or particular persons, intimidate a population or compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act."

Physically the attack was likely well targeted. It was shipped very recently, so it's likely only few of those beepers made into the public market.

However, the attack happened right in the middle of general population far away from the theater of war. This obviously intimidates and mentally damages innocent people living their normal lives. So it can be considered as a form of terrorism.

No government, especially those of developed countries, should be allowed to inflict harms on individuals, living in peace, in any form, whether physical or mental.

TiredOfLife 3 days ago

>No government, especially those of developed countries, should be allowed to inflict harms on individuals, living in peace, in any form, whether physical or mental.

That's why they targeted members of Hezbollah (a terrorist organization) and not children playing football like Hezbollah does.

  • esjeon 2 days ago

    Yeah, but, again, it was a large scale attack right in the middle of general population. It wouldn't be problematic if this attack was targeting few key members, but thousands certainly intimidate normal people unnecessarily.