082349872349872 10 months ago

No, I was referring to a different time constant: the τ such that the number of times the whiskey priest[0] falls off the wagon[1] occuring at t<τ equals the number of times the decay occurs at t>τ.

So, just like the quantum watched pot never boils, the up-through-sales CEO would, out of habit alone, keep nurturing[2] their company officers — staying in touch (t<<τ) and shepherding them away from personal and towards corporate goals.

(My hypothesis being that an up-through-engineering CEO, not finding this behaviour natural, would have to make an explicit attempt to do so, and hence might experience severe cultural issues dealing with people who can deliver a great deal of value under the right leadership but require steady, if small[3][4], external inputs to keep them in the fold.)

[0] compare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Camillo_and_Peppone#Charac...

[1] pads headcount, orphans mistakes, etc.

[2] for a prospect: staying in touch and shepherding them towards close

[3] the shepherd's crook can be mightier than the prince's cannon. (back when we had Prince-Bishops they used to commission statues of themselves holding both sword and crook, emphasising their ability to use either temporal persuasion or moral suasion)

[4] see also the unstable yet controllable regime for designing fighter aircraft.

Reply View 1 reply
  • gradschoolfail 10 months ago

    The designoris (as well as the B2C sales (“marketers”) whom they tend to relate more to) should also have a time constant, such that the dynamics of navigating these various time constants do not tend to elevate them to any inner party (e.g. in AAPL, designoris getting driven out..)

    EDit: just saw that you replied to showrunning, thanks for directing my attention! I also replied to DG thread

    Reply View 0 replies