Comment by seydor

Comment by seydor 3 days ago

55 replies

> Who do you want to be able to spy on you

I buy chinese IP cameras. China cannot block my bank account / employment / communications.

dijit 3 days ago

Agreed.

All this fearmongering about telegram and tiktok is weird.

China can decide what it wants from me- I have no plans to visit or engage with regime; however my life is dependent on the US not thinking of me as interesting.

So, the less I give to US companies, the better.

Especially as, being a non-US citizen I have no right to privacy afforded to me in the constitution, and US companies can be forced to comply with the government in secret- much in the same way we consider that China does it to even part-owned China based companies.

  • ruraljuror 3 days ago

    The concern over tiktok is not that Xi’s autocratic regime is surveilling you, but manipulating the algorithms in its large social media market share to foment anti-American (& anti-Israeli) sentiment.

    • tracerbulletx 3 days ago

      Russia seems totally capable of doing that just by paying people and using bots.

      • Sabinus 3 days ago

        Indeed, but that doesn't mean you should expose the youth more to belligerent foreign controlled agitprop information channels.

      • mpweiher 2 days ago

        Knives are perfectly capable of killing you, so let's not worry about nuclear bombs?

      • kelnos 2 days ago

        Sure, there are many avenues to spread this sort of propaganda, but a state-run social media platform can certainly be a lot more effective than someone flooding someone else's social media platform with propaganda.

        Assuming the Chinese government is using TikTok for influence campaigns (they'd be foolish not to), they only way to stop it is to outright ban it in your country (which the US seems to be trying to do, with possibly-disastrous effects), or find a way to get your citizens to dislike it (good luck with that).

        While Russia is doing pretty well at their influence campaigns on other platforms, those platforms can choose, if they so desire, to step up their detection and banning efforts. It's a constant cat-and-mouse game, of course, but it's at least possible to stamp out most of that crap if you're willing to spend the resources to do so.

    • lupusreal 2 days ago

      My concern with tiktok is that it rots your brain like television, but far more effectively because it's rapid fire content constantly tuned to the individual user to keep them hooked on it. It's an instant gratification machine, effectively a drug, that fries people's attention spans. It has people spending hours a day consuming vapid short-form nonsense, and alters their psyche to make them less effective in other endeavors even when they aren't distracted by the app (particularly school, since it hits children particularly hard.)

      The medium is the message.

      • account42 2 days ago

        This is a very valid concern but it also applies to many "western" social media and entertainment channels.

        • lupusreal 2 days ago

          I have the same concern with those western apps too.

    • immibis 2 days ago

      Isn't Israel doing enough to foment anti-Israeli sentiment anyway?

      • Cthulhu_ 2 days ago

        It feels like they're spending more on pro-israel sentiments, and have for decades. A biblical quote about a beam in one's eye comes to mind whenever people go "but china!".

    • whatnotests2 3 days ago

      Isreal is doing just fine, drumming up dissent, based on it's behavior alone.

      • ilbeeper 2 days ago

        Right. That, and a few hundred million petrodollars

    • Woshiwuja 2 days ago

      [flagged]

      • voltaireodactyl 2 days ago

        Arguable in general, but certainly not if you’re the American government, which is what is being discussed here.

    • olalonde 2 days ago

      I'm not sure why influence should be illegal. What about books and movies? Or even schools and universities? American schools are probably the greatest source of anti-American / anti-Israel sentiment in the country. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXm-NYyWEAA1jNs?format=jpg&name=...

      If you believe in freedom of speech, you should also accept that people, including foreign people, may try to influence you. China doesn't believe in freedom of speech so they censor foreign sources of influence. Does America really want to go down that path?

      • lukan 2 days ago

        Books are quite static.

        But dynamic algorithms, targeting exactly you, knowing what mood you have in that moment (by analyzing what you have looked at, liked, disliked), what opinions you have etc. opens up a whole different world of influence possibilities amd I think those possibilities are just starting to get explored with AI. The data is already there.

      • hcfman 2 days ago

        The Netherlands also doesn’t believe in freedom of speech.

      • talldayo 2 days ago

        > American schools are probably the greatest source of anti-American / anti-Israel sentiment in the country.

        Damn the education system, and it's penchant for teaching the history of colonialism instead of a revisionist policy. What's next, after Mandatory Palestine we'll teach our children about the Civil War and slavery too? What an anti-America sentiment, clearly we need our conservative lawmakers to... I dunno, rewrite history for both countries? Teach feel-good cookie recipes instead of international politics?

        As long as America has anti-BDS laws there won't be any freedom of speech in the first place. Our first amendment rights are currently being suspended by international lobbyists that can't handle their share of due criticism. A shame, considering the US does so well to educate others on it's own embarrassing history, but is threatened with a lawsuit when anyone tries to meaningfully criticize Israel.

  • dghlsakjg 3 days ago

    The constitution does not exclusively apply to US citizens is the good news.

    The bad news is that there is no explicit and broad right to privacy in the constitution. You are protected by the fourth amendment requiring a warrant for searches and seizures, but the court has ruled that, citizen or not, if a third party like Meta willingly hands over your info, it’s fair game. L

  • cryptonector 2 days ago

    "You have no privacy, get used to it!" -Scott McNealy

    Scott was not saying "you should have no privacy"; he was making a statement of fact. That was nearly two decades ago, and he was prescient and right.

  • PaulDavisThe1st 2 days ago

    > So, the less I give to US companies, the better.

    and all of a sudden, you're interesting.

    • talldayo 2 days ago

      You shouldn't be downvoted, the whole industry ought to know by now that Palantir aggregates multiple international sources of data for sale to American defense agencies. If you're legitimately afraid of America, the internet has few places of refuge.

  • JumpCrisscross 2 days ago

    > China can decide what it wants from me- I have no plans to visit or engage with regime; however my life is dependent on the US not thinking of me as interesting

    If you have something of interest to Beijing and you’re doing something shameful or illegal in America, and they have evidence, they have leverage. This is human asset development 101.

    Most people don’t have skills or information relevant to a foreign state. But some do, and for them being mindful about not giving a foreign adversary blackmail leverage is prudent.

  • nindalf 2 days ago

    > my life is dependent on the US not thinking of me as interesting

    Why do people engage in this sort of larping, like they're secret agents or intellectuals that may be hunted at any moment by the grey suits in western governments?

    We know it's not true for this person in particular because one click on their HN profile tells you their real name. I stopped there, but I'm sure there is plenty of additional info available with 3-4 more clicks. If they were really so afraid of government reprisal like this larping suggests, maybe they'd attempt to be at least a little pseudo-anonymous.

    The actual fact is that 99.9999999999% of us are boring and will remain boring no matter what kind of comments we write on HN. It wouldn't hurt to touch grass once in a while.

  • babkayaga 2 days ago

    cleber. but china can blackmail you into working for them. you will have no recourse if it does.

    • dijit 2 days ago

      Blackmail me how? By giving information to the people who would have had it otherwise?

      Hardly a defensible position to blackmail someone from.

      • pvaldes 2 days ago

        Anybody that has lots of videos from you could train a deep fake realistic model and create a fake video depicting you committing a major crime. Sadly blackmail is the easier part.