Did you try it? It appears to use AI for search and summary but not for a foundational knowledge base. I asked it about a niche topic and I got a very useful encyclopedia-type report that included real links to published research. This is a topic that I have previously spent a lot of time on in Google Scholar where I had to skim and reject a lot of false positives that show up with simple keyword search.
Just like on actual-Wikipedia you should read the linked references and not completely trust the body text, but also like on actual-Wikipedia the majority of the report's text seemed aligned with the content of the linked references.
Did you try it? It appears to use AI for search and summary but not for a foundational knowledge base. I asked it about a niche topic and I got a very useful encyclopedia-type report that included real links to published research. This is a topic that I have previously spent a lot of time on in Google Scholar where I had to skim and reject a lot of false positives that show up with simple keyword search.
Just like on actual-Wikipedia you should read the linked references and not completely trust the body text, but also like on actual-Wikipedia the majority of the report's text seemed aligned with the content of the linked references.