Comment by mannykannot

Comment by mannykannot 3 days ago

2 replies

The thing about the alternative you offer is that none of the names in it are made-up, other than that Kowalski may be a fictional character.

There is nothing inherently wrong with made-up names, and some genres will require more than others, but I suspect that sentences in the style of McCaffrey's are partly intended to draw in the reader who feels, vaguely and probably subconsciously, as someone who has the inside scoop on esoteric knowledge from having deduced what sort of entities these names denote. To be clear, I am not immune to the effect, and it can be pleasant in small doses if the rest of the story is engaging.

PhasmaFelis 3 days ago

That maybe very well be true, but it still doesn't indicate any problem with the McCaffrey sentence.

Also note that it's the start of the second chapter, so some of those nouns may have been introduced already.

  • mannykannot a day ago

    My first paragraph is very well true. The second one says "there is nothing inherently wrong with made-up names", which seems to be in agreement with what you hold to be true.

    I am also entirely in agreement with the position that no significant criticism of the author can be made from a single sentence, especially when presented without context.