johncoene 2 days ago

First, how is that "giving myself an excuse"? Second, it's a total non sequitur, and even then, it's a day old has it broken?

Reply View 3 replies
  • brudgers 2 days ago

    the syntax might change, things will break, expect bugs.

    Bugs are normal software development.

    Changing syntax and breaking things make work for everyone else for the convenience of developers. Reliability is what makes a tool a tool.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • Terretta 17 hours ago

      > Changing syntax and breaking things make work

      How else might one explore a new language (vapour) in the open among interested like-minded developers seeking to iterate on a tool found lacking (R)?

      Changing and iterating things makes.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • ausbah 11 hours ago

        they aren’t wrong. backwards compatibility is a suppose to one of the first promises any mature programming languages. unless you make it explicit via noting breaking changes in major version updates (1.X.X —> 2.X.X) or the language is purely for R&D and makes no guarantee of anything

        Reply View 0 replies
[removed] 12 hours ago
[deleted]
Reply View 0 replies