Comment by detourdog
I’m surprised that understanding how to be thought unfolds is being considered not relevant to the answer. I have done a lot of problem solving in groups and alone. How thoughts develop seems fundamental to understand the solutions.
The story regarding the banning of terms that can be used with a reasoning system is a big red flag to me.
This sort of knee jerk reaction displays immature management and an immature technology product.
a little late to reply, but perhaps you see this. does it not make impression to you that lots of these articles on AI that get published are very childish. not in the math sense, but in the rasoning sense. besides, most of them are anything but interdisciplinary. I've almost never encountred prompt engineers who actually tried to delve into what GPTs do, and then these CoT guys, they don't know a thing about predicat logic, yet try to invent it anew.
On your comment reg. banning tokens/terms we are on the same page. We can agree all of this is very immature, and many of the peoples also, including this lot of chinese kids who seem to put out one paper per our. You see, the original seq2seq paper is 8 pages, topic included. Can you imagine? But Sutskever was ot a child back then, he was already deep into this all. We can easily state/assume the LLM business is in its infancy. It may easily stay there for a century until everyone levels up.