Comment by geodel

Comment by geodel 4 days ago

2 replies

The problem here is with multiple tens of thousands employees in IT/Software field in Amazon and their pay pretty close to top among employers at that scale, executives remain absolutely convinced no significant churn is expected.

Further to that point people who are indispensable and absolutely want/need remote work have their managers and even 1-2 level above in confidence to get their demand fulfilled like always before.

This leaves majority of employees who hate these rules but no leverage or wherewithal to get what they want from management which has no reason to listen.

> Will they strike out on their own and become freelancers who work on their own terms

A few of course can but to most no one including Amazon will pay that kind of money for writing API which calls API which calls API.. This is what most people do at the end of day.

Retirement sounds most reasonable for people who have earned and saved enough and not trying to reach or compare to earnings of directors, VPs and above.

A4ET8a8uTh0 4 days ago

I will two additional points. Executives assume that the upcoming recession ( assuming it is a recession ) will make most people hesitate. It is a rational, if an annoying calculation. Separate issue that is semi-related to the timing, is the benefit of not having to lay people off -- some will quit.

Naturally, some would question the wisdom of making people, who can quit, quit, but I get the feeling that the management,as a group, is pissed off about the whole WFH.

  • geodel 4 days ago

    Indeed. Both points make total sense. Though on quitting part I am not sure if numbers would significant enough to meet any internal target.